- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 01:07, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Radlock Trainer
edit... that the Radlock Trainer was built by members of the Hull Experimental Gliding Club in their spare time?
Created/expanded by TSRL (talk). Nominated by The Bushranger (talk) at 22:33, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Length and creation timing are good. AGF on citations to off-line source. Hook goes a bit beyond (i.e., "in their spare time") what is stated in article. Several cited statements are the editor's descriptions of items shown in photos, which may be approaching OR. Only cited statement in Operational history section does not seem to be supported by the cited source. -- Donald Albury 13:53, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Tweaked the History cite, and I'll ping the original author. Meanwhile... - The Bushranger One ping only 20:05, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- The Operational history section is very short, and can probably be dropped if it can't be sourced. ALT1 is fine, if not very sexy. I don't think there's much chance of getting a sexy hook out of this article. -- Donald Albury 20:36, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the Radlock Trainer was built by members of the Hull Experimental Gliding Club in their workshop?
- I'm satisfied. Ready to go. -- Donald Albury 00:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
