The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: @Tamzin: Other than the already noted CC-BY content above, most of the Earwig responses are false positives. Hook is interesting and sourced. Good for length and newness. Tamzin is below the emergency QPQ threshhold and 1 QPQ has been provided. I'd be interested in seeing some variants of the hook. Currently it feels, verbose. Happy to proceed. No preference on hook. Image below looks fine as well. All good to go. Seddontalk 00:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
@Seddon: Personally, I think this is a good use case for a longer-but-still-quirky hook, but okay, how about:
Come on, no image hook? Bremps... 23:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
@Bremps: I didn't propose the image because, great as it is, it's not-independently-significant fan art. But if that doesn't bother the reviewer and promoter, then I'd defer to them. All I'll add is that instead of (pictured) we would want to say (depicted) and then caption as "An artist's impression of a ray cat". -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 02:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
I added the main page image template to the top of the nomination, image checks out CC4.0 and is in article. You may wish to modify the image caption. – Reidgreg (talk) 15:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
This might make a good quirky hook.(?) Note: Article contains about a paragraph total copied from Zhang 2014. This is done in compliance with WP:PLAGIARISM (Method articles are CC-BY unless stated otherwise), and is not enough text to bring the article below 1,500 characters of prose.
