Template:Did you know nominations/Red House Museum
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Yoninah (talk) 21:54, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator; persistent edit-warring
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Red House Museum
edit
Red House Museum
- ... that Red House Museum was the inspiration for the house named Briarmains in Charlotte Brontë's novel Shirley, but is now under threat of closure?
- ALT1:... that Red House Museum was the inspiration for Briarmains in Charlotte Brontë's novel Shirley?
2x expanded and sourced (BLP) by Storye book (talk). Self-nominated at 17:15, 11 July 2016 (UTC).
@Storye book: BLP expansions, as their name implies, are for biographies of living people with no sources. (I don't think this house is a living person.) You will need to expand the article 5x. I think you need 2,980 characters of readable prose but you only have 2,092. Additionally, a QPQ is necessary. The expansion is new enough, on the other hand. Raymie (t • c) 22:41, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, Raymie. It's a while since I've been in the DYK system, and I'm rusty already. QPQ done. Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Quartz. I plan to further expand the article later today. Storye book (talk) 08:59, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Update: I have now completed the 5 x expansion. Storye book (talk) 16:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawal of nomination: With much regret I shall now have to withdraw the nomination. Since I began expanding it, the article has received several long series of unhelpful edits involving repeatedly removing an entire (balanced and fully reffed) paragraph, repeatedly introducing wrong information, and here and there a few typos. It is impossible to work on an article when you have to spend most of the time correcting another editor's mistakes. In the circumstances I don't think I can get this article to the required standard for DYK and keep it there so long as this article is subject to repeated heavy interference and reversions. Storye book (talk) 07:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)