Template:Did you know nominations/Redcliffe railway station

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Z1720 (talk) 19:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Redcliffe railway station

(

)

... that Redcliffe railway station, which opens today, has been renamed twice since 2016? Source: Two of the stations on the Forrestfield-Airport Link have been renamed - Belmont (formerly Airport West) Locals have voted overwhelmingly in favour of renaming the first new station on the METRONET Forrestfield-Airport Link, Redcliffe.
- ALT1: ... that the name of Redcliffe railway station, which opens today, was voted on by a survey? Source: The McGowan Government asked the Public Transport Authority to initiate the survey in October in response to community debate over the station's name.
  - ALT1b: ... that the name of Redcliffe railway station was voted on by a survey?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Edward N. Hall
- Comment: I would like to reserve this hook to appear on the date of the station's opening, which is likely within the next few months but has not been set yet. No worries if the date ends up being more than six weeks away, this hook can just run without the specific date. I plan to nominate another article instead in that case.

5x expanded by Steelkamp (talk). Self-nominated at 05:57, 23 July 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - Refs just need to be added to the end of each paragraph
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: The article is new enough, long enough, no significant copyvio on Earwig, and hooks are cited and interesting. The only issue is that sources should be added to the end of each paragraph, but once that's done this nom should be ready for promotion. Date requests can't be more than six weeks in advance, so I added ALT1b in case you want to run it before the opening. BuySomeApples (talk) 05:03, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

@BuySomeApples: It should be ready now. Steelkamp (talk) 06:00, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks @Steelkamp: this one looks ready! BuySomeApples (talk) 20:23, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Adding a

per the review above. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)