- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 16:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Revolution of the Ganhadores
Improved to Good Article status by JJonahJackalope (talk). Self-nominated at 12:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Revolution of the Ganhadores; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Comment: @DYK admins: This has nothing to do with the hook, actually, but I've noticed that this nomination, together with many other ones for August 31 and September 1, isn't showing up correctly on WP:DYKN... Does anyone know what's going on over those sections? Oltrepier (talk) 13:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- The maximum number of template transclusions has been exceeded. Don’t worry; it’ll fix itself. Schwede66 14:12, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Overall:
@JJonahJackalope: Good article. Not sure how comfortable I am with the article using one source but I guess it's fine.
Onegreatjoke (
talk) 20:07, 1 September 2023 (UTC)