- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 16:26, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Right to truth
Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 15:15, 7 December 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall:
Created a little outside the 7-day window, but possibly expanded 5x within that window, and I won't be picky about that. Earwig turns up high probability of violation, but it's just all the long names of international orgs. I think either ALT could work and don't have a strong preference. Regarding ALT0, the author does hedge their quote a tiny bit; the full quote is
By way of a tentative conclusion to the question posed in the title of this article, it may be argued that the right to the truth stands somewhere...
But that's such a small thing I think we'd still be fine using ALT0 as proposed.
{{u|Sdkb}} talk 04:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Created a little outside the 7-day window, but possibly expanded 5x within that window, and I won't be picky about that. Earwig turns up high probability of violation, but it's just all the long names of international orgs. I think either ALT could work and don't have a strong preference. Regarding ALT0, the author does hedge their quote a tiny bit; the full quote is