- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Robert Burg
Created by LouisAlain (talk) and Gerda Arendt (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 16:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Overall:
This is my first review, so I am not at all confident in filling the check list right. I wonder if the phrasing of the hook could be clarified though? For example,
ALT1: ... that Robert Burg, a leading baritone at the Semperoper in Dresden between the First and Second World Wars, performed the title roles of Busoni's Dr. Faustus and Hindemith's Cardillac there? Source: [2] lajmmoore (Trying very hard @Yoninah: thank you for the help)
- Ah, glad you are progressing. @Lajmmoore: for the checklist template you use yes or no or NA (and some left blank) hahah no need with the symbols. The DYK checklist template guide is here. For the QPQ checker, just click on QPQ check by the right hand corner. When you click edit this nomination, the DYK toolbox will appear which gives you all of the tools needed to review the nomination. The QPQ check link will bring you to a GUI where you key in the username involved in the DYK. If they have five or more credits then yes they need a QPQ. VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 17:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- I reviewed now Template:Did you know nominations/Melinda Plowman. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Vincent60030 and Gerda Arendt: - first of all thanks for the patience - I had missed the alert for your replies to this. So I'm right that there is a QPQ now (above)? I've edited the tempate above. I think it's good to go now? (Lajmmoore (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC))
- Yes for QPQ. I guess the bot will pick up the changed icon, but have no experience in the template, - I do my reviews on prose. Thank you for the review! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Lajmmoore, Yes, you are right. Normally any follow-up comments or ticks are placed at the bottom but this suffices. Thank you <3 VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 07:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Hang on, I have just noticed you suggested an ALT1, which requires another reviewer to look at this. VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 07:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Don't make it complicated ;) - The ALT is a different wording of the same facts, therefore requires no other reviewer. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
ALT1 is simply a rephrase of ALT0. Restoring tick. Yoninah (talk) 13:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)