Template:Did you know nominations/Robert F. Utter

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Robert F. Utter

Improved to Good Article status by DannyS712 (talk) and Eddie891 (talk). Nominated by DannyS712 (talk) at 23:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC).

  • Hi DannyS712, review follows: article promoted to GA on 10 September; article exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; checks on a random sample of sources revealed no issues with overly close paraphrasing, there are a lot of quotes but all seem to be properly attributed; hook is interesting, mentioned in the article and backed up by the source cited there; a QPQ has been carried out (from 18 months ago, but doesn't seem to have been used before). Looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2020 (UTC)