Template:Did you know nominations/Roman Theatre at Apamea
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 14:02, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Roman Theatre at Apamea
edit- ... that the Roman Theatre at Apamea in Syria is one of the largest surviving theatres of the Roman world?
Created/expanded by Zozo2kx (talk). Self nom at 16:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Date, length OK; article well-cited. Reference AGF. But the hook does not precisely reflect the wording of the article; inserting the word "considered" after "is" would remedy this. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 17:55, 6 November 2012 (UTC)- (edit conflict) Also reviewing this. I agree with Peter. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:02, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- That's a touch weaselly. Looking at both Finlayson references, I think the claim is justified, but currently supported by by only one of them. A bit of adding to the article (re the Theatre of Pompey in Rome, the only one clearly larger etc) would solve the problem, & it would benefit from it. Johnbod (talk) 18:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- Well, the "surviving" keyword rules out the Pompey theatre in Rome (and any others that we may not know about, e.g. Antioch). I rephrased the article to be like the hook (with the added detail about Ephesus). Do you think that works? Yazan (talk) 18:32, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
That works for me. (I made "theatres" plural in the article). --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 19:03, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
