Template:Did you know nominations/Row hammer

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:26, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Row hammer

edit

Improved to Good Article status by Dsimic (talk). Nominated by SSTflyer (talk) at 06:45, 28 September 2015 (UTC).

  • Long enough; GA'ed recently enough; neutral; initialisms galore (not a DYK rule but either cool or dweeby depending on your point of view); no copyvio etc. (though it is hard to avoid some similarities on techy topics without going wrong); I checked a good proportion of the sources but not all as I was beginning to get a bit "source hammered";it's cited like there's a sale on in the cite shop; hook correct and cited (though it does imply that these are "in the wild" not just proof of concept). One thing, not particularly DYK-related: it is referred to throughout as the "row hammer effect", I think you should either move it to "Row hammer effect" or let yourself go with a bit of "row hammering" and "row hammered". Good to go. Belle (talk) 10:31, 28 September 2015 (UTC)