Template:Did you know nominations/Ruth H. Alexander

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:09, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Ruth H. Alexander

edit
  • Reviewed: Pending

Created by HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk). Self-nominated at 00:58, 18 March 2019 (UTC).

  • The article is definitely new enough and clearly long enough. I see no issues with neutrality and everything is properly cited, including the hook suggestions. I checked via the Copyvio Detector and everything looks good. I'd say going with Alt1 would be best, as it is the most clear and least cluttered option, while still retaining importance and interest. And you don't need the QPQ requirement because this is only your 4th DYK nomination. So it looks like everything is good to go. SilverserenC 04:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC)