- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 14:00, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Saša Broz
edit- ... that Croatian theater director Saša Broz trademarked the name and signatures of her grandfather, Yugoslav president Josip Broz Tito? Source: [1]
- Reviewed: Stormy Lake (Alaska)
Created by Surtsicna (talk). Self-nominated at 22:37, 15 June 2018 (UTC).
Hook is interesting and neutral, page was submitted to DYK less than one week after creation and is more than long enough, but are there any English-language sources available supporting the hook? While non-English sources can be used, those in English are preferable for the English version of Wikipedia, mainly because they make it easier to verify details and check for copyright violations. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:27, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I cannot find any. I normally use Google to translate the sources when reviewing such articles. Surtsicna (talk) 01:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Understandable. In that case, I'll assume good faith that the translation is faithful and doesn't violate any copyrights. Source overall seems credible and QPQ has been done. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:29, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Actually I’ve been trying for five days to get this user to indicate whether or not my improvements satisfy the concerns they raised in ther QPQ review of my nomination, to no avail. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:19, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Three days, not five, and you would have had more luck if you posted on my talk page. This is a very odd place to write about it. Surtsicna (talk) 15:47, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- I brought it up here because you were claiming QPQ was satisfied but you weren’t following up after my first remark [2] (in which I apparently wrongly assumed you were watching the nom for any replies) and then two days later when I pinged you [3] to which you also did not reply so three days after that I brought it up here. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:06, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Three days, not five, and you would have had more luck if you posted on my talk page. This is a very odd place to write about it. Surtsicna (talk) 15:47, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Actually I’ve been trying for five days to get this user to indicate whether or not my improvements satisfy the concerns they raised in ther QPQ review of my nomination, to no avail. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:19, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
