Template:Did you know nominations/Sam Quek

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:04, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Sam Quek

Improved to Good Article status by BennyOnTheLoose (talk). Nominated by Bait30 (talk) at 03:59, 31 October 2020 (UTC).


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall:

  • The article was brought to GA status within seven days from the nomination. It is long enough, neutral and well-sourced. Earwig found one problematic website but it seems to be a direct copy form the article itself. The hook is within the character limit, it's content is interesting and is backed up by a reliable inline citation. QPQ also done. Image is published under a cc licence, used in the article and clear. I think this is good to go. Modussiccandi (talk) 20:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)