Template:Did you know nominations/Sandese Aate Hai

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:09, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Sandese Aate Hai

(

)

... that Javed Akhtar won the Filmfare Award and the Screen Award for writing the lyrics of the song Sandese Aate Hai, whereas its singer Sonu Nigam won the Zee Cine Award?

Reviewed: Satyavadi Raja Harishchandra

Created by Vibhijain (talk). Self nominated at 11:13, 25 April 2013 (UTC).

Hook interesting, article long enough, no copyvios. Hook is cited. My main problem is with the "plot" section. There are no citations, and one sentence is incomplete: "Then the three, along with , ." This needs cleanup before I can pass this nom.--¿3family6 _contribs 22:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

I though that references are not needed for Plots (see FAs Taare Zameen Par#Plot and Lage Raho Munna Bhai#Plot). I have removed the section as of now. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 05:42, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

I don't know much about plot guidelines, especially when applied to songs. If you can link to the guidelines here, you can re-add the section if it meets the requirements.--¿3family6 _contribs 15:54, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

I myself could not find the guidelines, so let the plot section not be there. The article is still long enough. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 06:59, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

The hook is interesting and the article is long enough. However, the sources #1 and #6 do not meet WP:RS

Source #1 is Radio City (Indian radio station). I have replaced #6 with Radio 90.5. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 17:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Length and date both check out fine, the hook is appropriately referenced inline. The sources appear to meet WP:RS in my opinion, and checks for copy-vio and close paraphrasing have revealed no problems. Good to go. Harrias ^talk 15:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC)