- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bilorv (talk) 12:18, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Sarojini Nadar
- ... that since 2016, Sarojini Nadar has been Director of the Desmond Tutu Centre for Religion and Justice, and Desmond Tutu Research Chair at University of the Western Cape in South Africa? Source: Public Lecture by Professor Sarojini Nadar: "Sanctifying Sex" [1]
- ALT1:... that Sarojini Nadar's research has focused on gender-based violence, sexual and reproductive health, and critical pedagogy in higher education? Source: Public Lecture by Professor Sarojini Nadar: "Sanctifying Sex" [2]
- ALT2:... that South African theologian Sarojini Nadar examined the Book of Esther as a "text of terror" in normalizing rape culture? "to encourage the participants to read this segment of the text as a "text of terror."" and "How is it that in spite of (or perhaps because) of their erasure, rape and sexual violence have been so ingrained and rationalized through their representations as to appear 'natural' and inevitable to women as to men?" Nadar Thesis, p. 279 & p. 283, respectively.
Created by Melcous (talk). Nominated by Figureskatingfan (talk) at 21:31, 6 June 2021 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New enough:
- check comments section - Long enough:
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting: - check comments
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
the article has two edits only in the View history, first it was created and in the second edit, only a wiki link has been added. So, I'm not sure if it has been expanded 5x. The first hook is more interesting, the second hook is less interesting. This is my second review only, so I would appreciate it if someone else could look over it. Salukk (talk) 10:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
New enough (written June 5) & all hooks approved. Relying on review of other criteria by Salukk. Salukk, articles written or moved to the mainspace within 7 days of the nomination qualify for DYK. QuakerSquirrel (talk) 12:53, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
