Template:Did you know nominations/Scapteriscus borellii

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 20:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Scapteriscus borellii, Scapteriscus vicinus, Scapteriscus abbreviatus

( Back to T:TDYK )

( Article history links:

)

~~... that a wasp, a fly and a worm are being used to control southern, tawny and shortwinged mole crickets in Florida?~~

Reviewed: Bouvier's red colobus
Comment: Also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Zapiekanka and Template:Did you know nominations/Great Leap Brewing

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 10:14, 16 May 2015 (UTC).

Articles long enough, new enough, and well cited. No problems identified with the articles. Hook fact does not sit quite right, Steinernema scapterisci isnt a worm in the order Annelida, could it be clarified to nematode? --Kev min § 02:22, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

I would argue that the word "worm" is OK. Have a look at our article Worm which covers more than just annelids, but I could change the word "worm" to "roundworm" in the hook if you thought necessary. I could link all three words to their species articles, but I think that would leave the hook overlinked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

I would be totally fine with roundworm, one of the things we should be doing is avoiding ambiguity and teaching afterall. :-) --Kev min § 15:18, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

ALT1 ... that a wasp, a fly and a roundworm are being used to control southern, tawny and shortwinged mole crickets in Florida?

That works for me, articles are good still, no policy issues identified, and hooks check. Good to go.--Kev min § 15:02, 8 June 2015 (UTC)