Template:Did you know nominations/Schedule F appointment
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:19, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Schedule F appointment
- ... that an estimated tens of thousands of U.S. federal workers are eligible to lose due-process job protections by being shifted into Schedule F appointments?
- ALT1: ... that an October 2020 executive order makes an estimated tens of thousands of U.S. federal workers eligible to lose due-process job protections?
- Source: [1] "Federal scientists, attorneys, regulators, public health experts and many others in senior roles would lose rights to due process and in some cases, union representation, at agencies across the government. The White House declined to say how many jobs would be swept into a class of employees with fewer civil service rights, but civil service experts and union leaders estimated anywhere from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands in a workforce of 2.1 million."
- Reviewed: Tracey McLellan
Created by Antony-22 (talk) and Objectivesea (talk). Nominated by Antony-22 (talk) at 03:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC).
This article is new enough and I judge it to be long enough; there is some text moved from another article, but that article is also new enough and the author credited here. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. I prefer ALT1 over the original hook. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
