Template:Did you know nominations/Science Fact and Science Fiction: An Encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Dying (talk) 11:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Science Fact and Science Fiction: An Encyclopedia
- ... that Brian Stableford blamed the cancellation of the follow-up to his 2006 book Science Fact and Science Fiction: An Encyclopedia on the availability of information online? Source: Interview with Stableford
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Down the rabbit hole (idiom)
- Comment: On the topic, Stableford also said "The fact that Wikipedia is so easy to use easily outweighs the disadvantages it carries in the forms of promiscuous misinformation and malicious disinformation." This could potentially be added to the article and incorporated in an alt hook, but I thought it a bit "navel-gazy".
Improved to Good Article status by TompaDompa (talk). Self-nominated at 17:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Science Fact and Science Fiction: An Encyclopedia; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Date (recent GA pass), size, copyvio spotcheck, QPQ, hook, hook's source, interest-factor and neutrality, all GTG. Thank you for expanding the stub I started :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:01, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
