Template:Did you know nominations/Shanthi Kalathil
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 01:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Shanthi Kalathil
Shanthi Kalathil, NSC Coordinator
- ... that former senior Biden administration human rights official Shanthi Kalathil (pictured) believes Radio Free Asia "filled a critical role in combating Chinese disinformation"? Source: https://www.rfa.org/about/releases/rfa-welcomes-new-members-to-its-board
- ALT1: ... that former senior Biden administration human rights official Shanthi Kalathil (pictured) believes the Chinese government uses "its unique carrots" as well as sticks to "create a foundation for its influence"? Source: https://www.congress.gov/115/meeting/house/108056/witnesses/HHRG-115-FA05-Wstate-KalathilS-20180321.pdf
- Reviewed:
Created by W9793 (talk). Self-nominated at 06:46, 14 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Shanthi Kalathil; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
First, the good: this nom does not require a QPQ (W9793, this will be your fifth if approved, so further noms will require QPQs). The article is long enough, new enough, and referenced. The hooks are interesting enough and referenced. However, Earwig returned an incredibly high match rate of 56.6%. Part of this is because of the numerous unavoidable titles she has held, so we can ignore that. However, much of this because of extensive quotes by her as well as some lifted text that must be fixed. While the quotes are generally in the public domain, on the role of information and technology in international affairs
appears to lift from this. While this can be resolved using paraphrasing, I think it speaks to a neutrality issue in this article. I can find no reliable sources that outright criticize her, but it should be reliable sources adding commentary on her and her comments rather than extended quotations. Plenty of reliable sources exist on her, so I expect that the necessary changes can be made without the size of the article taking a hit. I'd ask that these fixes be done within a week, with a ping to notify me when they're done. ~ Pbritti (talk) 19:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
