- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:43, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Silver Quilty
edit
Silver Quilty
- ... that in 1908, Silver Quilty (pictured) was the first person to play the flying wing position in Canadian football? Source 1Source 2Source 3
- Reviewed: John FitzWalter, 2nd Baron FitzWalter
- Comment: Request February 8, 2019, birthday anniversary of Quilty
5x expanded by Flibirigit (talk). Self-nominated at 22:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC).
Article's prose has been extended five fold, within the last seven days (two days ago, as of this statement), and is long enough. Formatting is well done, content is interesting and the first source is suffice, though I recommend adding it to the mention of 'flying wing' in the introduction (using <ref name= > is helpful), however I suggest the term "flying wing" be linked to 'History of American Football Positions#Early Canadian football' (as shown) to add clarity. Image is less than 100x100px in appearance and in free use by Canadian copyright public domain laws. ThomDevexx ॐ (talk) 14:59, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- HeyJude70 I did not wikilink "flying wing" in the hook because the article History of American football positions has maintenance tags at the top. It is generally frowned upon to link something on the main page that has tags on the top. The position is however linked from Quilty's article. Do you have any other concerns? Flibirigit (talk) 00:17, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Also, I did not put any citations in the introduction as per MOS:CITE. It is cited in the body instead. Flibirigit (talk) 00:59, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Flibirigit: Since HeyJude70 hasn't edited in weeks, I'll be taking over this nomination. While flying wing has its own article problems, I'm not really sure if not linking to it is really worth it. Perhaps a link to Canadian football positions would be a better alternative in this case? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- Narutolovehinata5, I am indifferent as to which article is linked to if needed. Either the History of American football positions#Early Canadian football section link (Flying wing) or the Canadian football article could be used. Unfortunately there is no History of Canadian football positions article, since it is merged with the American football positions. Flibirigit (talk) 15:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- The first link (American football positions) might be a good idea actually. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, are there any other issues? Flibirigit (talk) 01:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
I don't really see any more problems; the original reviewer's concerns appear to have been addressed and I don't have any of my own. This should be good to go both with the hook and the date request. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:20, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. Flibirigit (talk) 06:16, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, are there any other issues? Flibirigit (talk) 01:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- The first link (American football positions) might be a good idea actually. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Narutolovehinata5, I am indifferent as to which article is linked to if needed. Either the History of American football positions#Early Canadian football section link (Flying wing) or the Canadian football article could be used. Unfortunately there is no History of Canadian football positions article, since it is merged with the American football positions. Flibirigit (talk) 15:59, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
