Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/Sintax the Terrific

< Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Sintax the Terrific

edit
(
)

Created by The Cross Bearer (talk). Nominated by 3family6 (talk) at 21:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC).

  • General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 17:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

  • @Coffee: I've expanded that article, which includes some coverage of Brewer in secondary sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 03:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
    I'll let another reviewer look at it now. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
  • This article still relies too heavily upon primary sources. It does that to such an extent that one may wonder whether enough notability has been demonstrated to let this Syntax guy keep his article. Even the hook is annotated by primary sources. Please make an effort to improve the sourcing.—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 14:42, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm terribly sorry, but I'm not sold. You added AllMusic links that talk (very briefly) about deepspace5, and not Syntax in particular. If that displays notability, it's inherited notability and thus does not count. You also added a text from a source called "Sphere of Hip-Hop" which does not seem to be a notable source. The same thing applies for "Rapreviews.com." I really do want this article (and its DYK) to survive, but I can't do that on the basis of these sources.—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 22:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
I do know that notability is not inherited through the Deepspace5 mentions, that was just part of the expansion. I included more citations to the Houston Chronicle, Cross Rhythms, and CMWeb, independent sources that were already in the article. RapReviews.com is a professional review site, and is even used by the aggregator Metacritic. It is included on the list of reliable music sources found through WikiProject Albums. Sphere of Hip Hop is also a professional review source, though admittedly not as high profile as RapReviews.com. It is included on the List of reliable sources found through the Christian music project. I don't see how with significant discussions in five independent reliable sources, plus the Rap Up feature (an interview in an independent reliable source), the subject is not notable.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 23:22, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
  • I'll let someone else take the reins here, then. I remain highly skeptical.—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 23:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
I agree with the notability concerns and have nominated the article for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sintax the Terrific. I suggest that we put this review on hold pending the outcome of that discussion. Best.4meter4 (talk) 18:33, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
The article successfully passed the AFD which should allay notability concerns. The article is new enough, long enough, neutral, and has inline citations. The hook is verified to an online reference. QPQ is done. This article can be promoted. Best.4meter4 (talk) 03:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Sintax_the_Terrific&oldid=1018090550"