Template:Did you know nominations/Social connection
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Social connection
edit... that social connectedness is as important to our well-being as food or water?
- ALT1 ... that social connectedness may be as important to our well-being as food or water?
- Reviewed: I still have to review another nomination and will post this here once it's done.
5x expanded by Laurisela (talk). Self-nominated at 18:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC).
This interesting and well-written article is a five-fold expansion and is long enough and new enough. The hook facts are stated in the article and are cited to a paper where the abstract reads "Existing evidence supports the hypothesis that the need to belong is a powerful, fundamental, and extremely pervasive motivation" and I am assuming good faith that the hook is further supported by the part of the paper I cannot see. The article is neutral and Earwig's tool did not bring up any policy issues. No QPQ is required for this first time nominator. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:30, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
@Cwmhiraeth: did you look at the 5x expansion? It seems to have started on November 13, nearly a month before this was nominated. Yoninah (talk) 19:41, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Indeed I did look. I took the size at 1677 bytes on 23 November and decided it was a five-times expansion, and was nominated at 17 rather than 7 days. I made allowance in the newness criterion for this being a first-time DYK nominator who might not know the requisite time scale. I saw the creator was a student editor and did not like the idea of discouraging them by sticking to relatively unimportant criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: OK. But I would change "is" to "may be" in the hook. That's how the article phrases it. Yoninah (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- OK. I have substituted ALT1 and approved it! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Many thanks! Yoninah (talk) 21:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: OK. But I would change "is" to "may be" in the hook. That's how the article phrases it. Yoninah (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Indeed I did look. I took the size at 1677 bytes on 23 November and decided it was a five-times expansion, and was nominated at 17 rather than 7 days. I made allowance in the newness criterion for this being a first-time DYK nominator who might not know the requisite time scale. I saw the creator was a student editor and did not like the idea of discouraging them by sticking to relatively unimportant criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
