The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 09:51, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Soim

edit

Created by Soman (talk). Self-nominated at 14:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC).

  • Article is new enough, nominated day of creation. Article prose size is ~2300 characters, exceeding the 1500 requirement. Article written in a dispassionate, neutral manner. All paragraphs are cited using inline citations. No copying, close paraphrasing, or other copyvio issues detected. Hook is interesting, accurate, inline cited to references #1 and #6 at time of review. #1 is offline, so AGF, but the DYK hook can be directly attributed to reference #6. Hook is neutrally stated fact, and meets all formatting requirements. QPQ complete. No image to check against. This article about an interesting historical footnote is ready for and deserves main page exposure. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)