Template:Did you know nominations/South Carolina v. North Carolina

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

South Carolina v. North Carolina

(

)

... that in South Carolina v. North Carolina, the U.S. Supreme Court appointed Kristin Linsley Myles as special master, the first woman to hold that position?

ALT1:... that in South Carolina v. North Carolina, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on issues related to the equitable apportionment of water from the Catawba River?
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ernst Pepping
Comment: The second hook is more germane to the case, the first is arguably more interesting. I have no preference.

Created by Coemgenus (talk). Self-nominated at 18:36, 20 May 2015 (UTC).

New and long enough, within policy, spot checks reveal no copyvios, both hooks check out, QPQ done. Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 21:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)