- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Vanamonde93 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:53, 12 June 2017 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Overall:
Qualifies under all DYK criterion. Recent GA promotion (one day before DYK nom). Neutral and sourced article and hooks. I do NOT like
ALT1. Although not a blatant COPYVIO in the article, the hook is an even closer paraphrasing of the first sentence of
Gifford (1996).
ALT0,
ALT2 and
ALT3 are all good to go. I think
ALT3 is the BEST and HOOKIEST. —አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 05:40, 1 July 2017 (UTC)