Template:Did you know nominations/Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Bloom6132 (talk) 00:09, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam
edit- ... that the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam changed the original Wim Crouwel-designed logo to a new one designed by Mevis & Van Deursen in September of 2012?
- Comment: Article is the subject of a Cornell University student project. Please be gentle!
5x expanded by Eas295 (talk), IchiniSanti (talk), Wdevriescornell (talk). Nominated by IchiniSanti (talk) at 18:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC).
Insufficient recent expansion. Nominated article contained 13679 characters of readable text on September 12. Currently the article contains 13649 characters, well short of the ~68.3K needed to qualify for 5x expansion (see Wikipedia:Did you know/Supplementary guidelines#Supplementary article length rules for additional information about the expansion requirement for preexisting articles). --Allen3 talk 23:48, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Allen3; unfortunately we were aware of this rule already, however, as I previously stated, the course we're in required us to submit the article to DYK by Tuesday afternoon (before we were expected to have added the fruits of our research to the article). I apologize for this breach in etiquette, however, our grade depends on our submission, and we'll be adding to the article over the next week and a half, though.. I'm not sure what procedure for dealing with this kind of thing is (deletion, reversion or otherwise) but I've screencaptured this conversation so I have proof that my group submitted our article. Once again, I apologize, if we had more control over our situation it would have happened differently. --IchiniSanti (talk) 17:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'd suggest you guys take advantage of the new eligibility criteria 1g and nominate this as a Good Article (GA) after you've finished adding all the research. The rules now allow GAs passed within the past 5 days to be nominated for DYK, so you'll get a two in one deal. —Bloom6132 (talk) 21:32, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
In the two weeks since the original nomination, the article has been expanded to 18117 characters of readable prose (~1.32x expansion) but is still well short of level needed to qualify for a 5x expansion. No indication that the article has been submitted to WP:GAC and expansion efforts for the nominators appears to have ceased by the due date of the class project that prompted this nomination. --Allen3 talk 12:11, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
