Template:Did you know nominations/Stephen Godin

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Stephen Godin

edit

Created by Philafrenzy (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy (talk) at 23:26, 4 January 2019 (UTC).

  • Long enough and new enough. QPQ needed. I don't have access to most sources but #1 does not support the content and I am not sure by #3 and #13 either. Hook apparently isn't supported by the article. No evidence of copyvio. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Ref 8 (offline) is an official notice in a newspaper listing the Stewards (an office) of Magdalen House for Reception of Penitent Prostitutes. Made some small changes. Should be OK now. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:37, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
The hook fact needs to be mentioned & cited in the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
It is "a steward of Magdalen House for Reception of Penitent Prostitutes" with ref. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
I take that the name of that institute means exactly what is says? Anyhow, QPQ is the only thing missing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:11, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
I think it does mean exactly what it says. They were always trying to reform prostitutes at that time. QPQ to follow. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Um, in that QPQ is there any comment on whether the article is sourced and whatnot? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:41, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
sure...done Whispyhistory (talk) 13:53, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)