Template:Did you know nominations/Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 11:58, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman
- ... that a court case ruled that video games may qualify for multiple types of copyright protection? Source: https://books.google.com/books?id=A9FCEAAAQBAJ&dq=Stern+Electronics+v+Kaufman&pg=PA88#v=onepage&q=Stern%20Electronics%20v%20Kaufman&f=false
- ALT1: ... that Stern Electronics sued Omni Video Games for a game they believed was infringing on Scramble's copyright? Source: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10750773141079770102&q=stern+electronics+inc+v+kaufman&hl=en&as_sdt=2,33
- ALT2: ... that Stern Electronics, Inc. v. Kaufman was one of the first lawsuits prompted by the increase in "knock-off" video games in the early 1980s? Source: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://en.wikipedia.org/&httpsredir=1&article=1048&context=elr. Page 140-146
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Meadow knapweed
Improved to Good Article status by Jorahm (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 20:30, 3 December 2022 (UTC).
Article promoted as GA within week of nom. Article fulfills all requisites of size, neutrality, and sourcing. No copyright issues identified beyond false positives on quotes. No image. Prefer hook one as more interesting and clear. Hooks are sourced and cited according to DYK standards within article. Overall swell job. Congrats on the GA, hope for more like this! ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:45, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
