Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/Stilt (ceramics)

< Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:20, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Stilt (ceramics)

edit
(
)

Created by Geni (talk). Self-nominated at 14:14, 13 April 2018 (UTC).

  • primary hook contains a redlink.
    • Primary hook sources are offline, source looks plausible, accepted under WP:AGF.
    • Article is long enough and new when nominated.
    • QPQ done.
    • ALT-1 is supported by a source, but it only indicates that one particular researcher has used stilts in this way, not that the practice is at all general.
    • ALT-2 accepted under AGF from offline sources (and I happen to know from personal experience thst it is accurate). However, ALT-2 is in my view not very interesting. I am adding an ALT-3.
    • No copyvio issues.
    • Article is within policy and is well sourced with inline citations.
    • Not approved pending addressing of the issues noted above. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:11, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Noting in DYK policy says you can't have a red-link in the hook. 2 may not be the most interesting but given the likely confusion over the name its about the only way to avoid having issues with a misleading hook.©Geni (talk) 23:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Geni, Wikipedia:Did you know/Supplementary guidelines#Other supplementary rules for the hook says: C1: No redlinks in the hook.. Why not leave kiln furniture in the hook but not wiki-link it? Or create kiln furniture as a stub? DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 00:33, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Hmm couple more options below (I don't like the chinese one because while that particular line of silt development goes back to china the ones from Ur are much the same):
    • ALT4:...that Stilts are a form of kiln furniture?
    • ALT5 ... that some Stilts have been designed to be used within saggars?Ceramics: Pottery". The crafts of Roman Britain
©Geni (talk) 16:56, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
  • ALT4 is basically ALT0 without the redlink. Sources for both ALT4 & ALT5 are offline, but cited inline and accords wiht my personal knowledge. Accepted on an AGF basis. This is now good to go with either ALT4 or ALT5. ALT3 was my own suggestion, so i can't approve it, but it could be OK if someone else does. I have no preference between ALT4 & ALT5. 5 is perhaps more interesting, but depends more on an unfamiliar technical term "Saggar". Nice job. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:33, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote ALT5, but first did some editing/wikifying of the article and also added an image of saggars. It would be nice if you had an image of a stilt.
  • The article is an orphan. Could you please link this page in at least one other Wikipedia article so it won't get an orphan tag? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Its not a orphan any more. Unfortunately the only image I have of a stilt sucks (the lighting in the Potteries Museum & Art Gallery is very poor).©Geni (talk) 00:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Restoring tick for ALT5 per DESiegel's review. Yoninah (talk) 07:42, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Stilt_(ceramics)&oldid=839349818"