- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Theleekycauldron (talk) 21:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Stowe Gardens
Temple of British Worthies (front)
- ... that the tomb of a greyhound called Signor Fido lies behind the Temple of British Worthies (pictured) at Stowe Gardens? Source: "By 1734 the niche at the back of the Temple of British Worthies housed a long inscription to a pious Italian, Signor Fido, who had come to England and in his old age had retired to house of a clergyman in the country (perhaps Rev. Conway Rand of Stowe). This faithful friend, agreeable companion and loving husband was, according to the last line, a grey-hound."
Bevington, Michael (1994). Stowe: The Garden and the Park. Capability Books. pp.93-94
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Reina Scully
- Comment: The page was created as part of a paid pilot for the National Trust, and its content was split from the Stowe House page, according to a previous talk page discussion. The source is not available online, but I can email my pdf to a reviewer.
Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Self-nominated at 14:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC).
Lajmmoore, this is an interesting article, but unfortunately it does not qualify as a new article, because its text was spun off from a pre-existing article (see WP:DYKCRIT). DYK has a lot of small print, so I would recommend rereading WP:DYK. TSventon (talk) 14:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks TSventon, I had looked for terms like "article splitting" in the rules, not the more generic wording. Never mind. If it became promoted to GA, would/could it be eligible? Many thanks for taking the time Lajmmoore (talk) 18:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Lajmmoore: Hmmm. While there's no rule specifically against that, I would probably IAR decline any article that was GA nommed immediately after its split. But if the split weighs in at, say, C-class, and is then improved to GA with original work, that's totally fine. Alternatively, the article can be 5x expanded with original work, but I doubt that's in the question. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 19:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks TSventon, I had looked for terms like "article splitting" in the rules, not the more generic wording. Never mind. If it became promoted to GA, would/could it be eligible? Many thanks for taking the time Lajmmoore (talk) 18:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
