- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 17:19, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Sumac (band)
edit- ... that Aaron Turner is into Sumac for the heaviest experience?
Created by Fezmar9 (talk). Nominated by Malconfort (talk) at 19:46, 27 January 2015 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, neutrally written, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Hook is catchy and hook ref verified and cited inline. However, the nominator has more than 5 DYK nominations to his credit, so a QPQ is in order. Yoninah (talk) 14:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, I forgot to mention that I've reviewed Creed (film), Belleville and North Hastings Railway and Elvis & Nixon.--malconfort (talk) 19:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Malconfort: I'm a little confused. You used these QPQs on several other reviews, too. It would be best to assign one QPQ to one nomination (although obviously, if it's a double nomination, you would have to provide 2 QPQs). Which QPQ are you assigning to this nomination, that you haven't assigned yet? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:17, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- This rule is confusing. I'm not really sure what are you talking about. I'll review two new submissions just for this one here.--malconfort (talk) 04:12, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni and Template:Did you know nominations/FourFiveSeconds.--malconfort (talk) 05:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Malconfort: I'm sorry the QPQ rule is confusing. It just means that for every article you submit for DYK, you also submit a review of someone else's DYK article nomination. Since you are only nominating one article, Sumac (band), you only need to submit one QPQ. Save the others for your next nomination. However, your review of Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni is not complete; you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been covered. Your review of Template:Did you know nominations/FourFiveSeconds is also not a review, just a suggestion for the hook. Perhaps you could flesh out your review of Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni as a QPQ for this Sumac nomination. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 10:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Updated the two. Please take a look, again.--malconfort (talk) 20:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni as a QPQ is acceptable. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 21:25, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks.--malconfort (talk) 20:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
