Template:Did you know nominations/Svayamvara

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Launchballer talk 23:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Svayamvara

The Svayamvara ceremony of princess Damayanti by Warwick Goble, 1913
The Svayamvara ceremony of princess Damayanti by Warwick Goble, 1913
  • ... that in ancient Indian literature, princesses would select their husbands from a lineup of suitors or through public contests in the distinctive matrimonial tradition called Svayamvara (pictured)?
  • Source: A Dictionary of Hinduism, Oxford Publications "For the daughter of a royal or a kṣatriya family, a way of selecting a husband which takes the form of either of a public contest between her suitors, or an assembly at which the bride-to-be simply chooses between them. Perhaps the best-known instances occur in the Mahābhārata, where Arjuna wins Draupadī by this method, and Damayantī prefers Nala to any of the assembled gods."
  • Brockington, John L (2006). "Epic Svayaṃvaras, Voice of the Orient: a Tribute to Prof. Upendranath Dhal". Academia.edu: 35–42.
  • Reviewed:
5x expanded by Seyamar (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜 06:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC).

  • : Seems new and long enough, almost entirely written by nominator; I have a few very minor problems with the sourcing that I think can be resolved by just copying some nearby sources, which I tagged: specifically, I think there should be a citation for the 1st paragraph of "Svayamvara in the Rg Veda" and one place in the 1st paragraph of "Damayantī's Svayamvara". Also, I think it would be more clear if the source at the end of the last paragraph of the lead were duplicated to the first two paragraphs as well if it applies to them, and per the DYK guidelines, I think that the source given has to be present at the end of the sentence giving the claim present in the hook. Don't see any neutrality issues. Article is (listing criteria) presentable, image & hook seem good, no other complaints. As for copyvio, not sure what the standards are on manual "spot-checks", so I'm leaving that for a second reviewer. Mrfoogles (talk) 04:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
@User:Mrfoogles, done what you have suggested.Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜 06:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
checkY Citation problems seem resolved, all that's left is a copyright check. Mrfoogles (talk) 16:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
  • @Mrfoogles: Have you completed the copyright check, and is this approved? If not, what else needs to be done? Z1720 (talk) 14:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
I was hoping someone else would also double-check my copyright checking (which is done, but I’m new), but that doesn’t seem to be happening anytime soon, so I’ll approve it. Mrfoogles (talk) 14:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
@Mrfoogles: Is the review completed?Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜 18:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
The green check in the circle means yes (it's a special DYK one that means it was accepted). Mrfoogles (talk) 18:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

@Z1720 Any update, it has been passed quite a long ago.Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜 17:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

@Seyamar: The article is at WP:DYKNA: it will be moved into a prep set when there is an open spot. Z1720 (talk) 18:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Unpromoted due to this discussion at WT:DYK—extensive sourcing problems with significant information not verified by sources. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
@Seyamar and Mrfoogles: Please address the above.--Launchballer 12:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
@Launchballer: already responded at the talk page of Talk:DYK, slowly Changing all ref to sfn for clarity, might take some time as currently not as free.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Seyamar (talkcontribs)
Two weeks is more than enough time to rectify the issues in this nomination @Seyamar:, and I will close this in 24 hours if I don't see some progress by then.--Launchballer 16:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)