Template:Did you know nominations/Tamarack Swamp

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  Ohc ¡digame! 09:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Tamarack Swamp

edit

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 20:41, 15 February 2014 (UTC).

  • The following has been checked in this review by Matty.007
  • I would quite like a new QPQ, given that the given one only has a line of rejection, instead of all addressed matters. I wouldn't mind if it had been failed because of your statement, but you were immediately countered by Orlady
  • Article mainspaced by Jakec on 15 February 2014, and has 3774 characters of readable prose
  • Every paragraph is sourced
  • Dup det found no copyvios in the source I spotchecked, and another I looked at was not a copyvio
  • Article is neutral
  • Hook is interesting and well sourced; though similar to the source, I think there isn't really another way of phrasing it (although if there is, please change it)
  • In all, please do another QPQ. Thanks, Matty.007 20:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)