Template:Did you know nominations/Taurence Chisholm

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Taurence Chisholm's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: rejected by —♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 06:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC).
Inactivity

Taurence Chisholm

edit

Created by Jrcla2 (talk). Self nominated at 15:13, 10 April 2013 (UTC).

  • Sizewise, this article is 1569 characters, so just long enough. Properly new enough and within policy. I don't see any close paraphrasing, but this nomination has got some issues with sources. First off, the reference needs to be directly after the hook, instead of at the end of the sentence. Also, some of the statements (like his business career) need a reference, while that citation of that big 2013 records PDF needs to state on what page the referenced information was found.—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 13:56, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
  • I removed the statement about his business career. I also added the media guide ref right after the hook, then tweaked the ref itself to show that it's page 91. On page 91, the caption to the bottom left photo (depicting Chisholm) is where it states that he is the only player to record 200+ assists all four years and was the only player to do it in any season. Jrcla2 (talk) 19:17, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the changes. The article is now, however, too short due to the removal of the business stuff. Can you expand it a bit? —♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 19:52, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
  • It has been a few days. Please work with the criticism listed above.—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 06:51, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Issues that arose on April 25 have still not been addressed. That's over a week. This is taking too long, so I'm closing this.—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 06:35, 3 May 2013 (UTC)