Template:Did you know nominations/Taylor Swift masters controversy

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 04:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Taylor Swift masters controversy

(

)

... that the Taylor Swift masters controversy was described by Rolling Stone as one of the "most important moments" in music of the 2010s decade? Source: Rolling Stone
- ALT1:... that during the Taylor Swift masters controversy, talent manager Scooter Braun acquired the master recordings of singer-songwriter Taylor Swift, and then sold them for a reported $300 million? Source: Variety

Reviewed: Miki Satō (singer)

Created by HĐ (talk). Self-nominated at 02:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC).

Hi HĐ hooks are interesting. ALT0 has been verified by provided citation, but the source for ALT1 just says the deal is believed to be north of $300 million and closed in the last two weeks, which cannot verify that they were definitely sold for 300 million dollars. Article is new enough, long enough, neutral and reasonably well written. It cites sources that are reliable for what they cite. Earwigs suggests no copyvio. A random spotcheck lines up. QPQ has been done. Nice work, just one thing. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Eddie891, thank you very much for your review. I have reworded to "a reported $300 million". Do you think it would be a good alternative? HĐ (talk) 03:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

: That aligns with the sourcing. "An estimated" would also be acceptable, I think. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)