Template:Did you know nominations/Teeth (song)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Teeth (song)

edit

Improved to Good Article status by Another Believer (talk). Nominated by FrB.TG (talk) at 20:42, 4 March 2016 (UTC).

  • Article was promoted to good on the same day as being nominated for DYK. It is long enough, neutrally written with lots of inline citations and I can find no evidence of copyright violations. The hook, in sourced in line and I have done some research on the term 'sued' as I wasn't sure if this was past tense referring to a successful outcome of a lawsuit - it seems not and this is the correct use. As this case was in 2013, it would be good to have the outcome of the case in the article? QPQ done. I agree this DYK should be saved for Gaga's birthday on 28th March. ツStacey (talk) 14:06, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
@Staceydolxx: I searched for the suit and I didn't see any results post-November 2015, the period when the suit took place. The media did not report the outcome or proceeding of the case. -- Frankie talk 15:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
I am just nervous about putting in the hook when he might have been unsuccessful therefore the hook appears unduly negative on Gaga (though I am sure she could handle it!) - Is there any chance we could think of a new hook - an admin might still choose to put it forward but I don't want to make the decision on this one! ツStacey (talk) 18:38, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Not sure on this one either but here is another one:

ALT1: ... that Lady Gaga's "Teeth" has been described as a "perverse march" and a "gospel ode" to sadomasochism?

  • with ALT1 - It doesn't make me want to listen to the song but it is intriguing as an article and is fully sourced. Thanks for offering an alternative - G2G! ツStacey (talk) 19:59, 18 March 2016 (UTC)