Template:Did you know nominations/Ten Portraits of Jews of the Twentieth Century

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Ten Portraits of Jews of the Twentieth Century

(

)

... that in Andy Warhol's Ten Portraits of Jews of the Twentieth Century, the "faces of the dead appear as if behind a veneer of modernity" according to the National Portrait Gallery? Source: "The disjunction between sitter and surface is a visual device that unites the portraits, but the series has a conceptual unity also. Warhol's insistence that the subjects be deceased invests the series with an inescapable character of mortality. The faces of the dead appear as if behind a veneer of modernity." Andy Warhol: 10 portraits of Jews of the 20th century, National Portrait Gallery

Reviewed: That's All, Brother

Created by No Swan So Fine (talk). Self-nominated at 09:20, 31 May 2019 (UTC).

Interesting art, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. I see coming that someone will complain that the hook says something in Wikipedia voice as fact which is the writing of just one critic. Can you insert that in a hook? Or say something else, such mention some of the subjects, - I always like links to Kafka ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. I love Kafka too! So much of the commentary on this series is overly negitive so I tried to choose a neutral quote. I've put the author (albiet anon) into the hook. No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:44, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, problem now is grammar, because I read "the National Portrait Gallery in Andy Warhol's ...". Please try to get the bold link to the front, and the NPG later. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:54, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Done. No Swan So Fine (talk) 07:42, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Fine! Next time, please write alternatives, instead of changing the original, but I'm not in the mood for formalities ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:46, 12 June 2019 (UTC)