- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:32, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Tetris Holding, LLC v. Xio Interactive, Inc.
- Comment: I am trying this out so if I screwed this up give me a chance to fix it.
Improved to Good Article status by Jorahm (talk) and Masem (talk). Nominated by Jorahm (talk) at 16:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Article new enough, long enough and is well-sourced and neutral. Earwig flagged a few long quotes. Hook is interesting and cited in article. Nominator only has one prior credit so no QPQ needed. Nice work! Pamzeis (talk) I am not watching this page so if you want my attention, please ping me. 06:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Article new enough, long enough and is well-sourced and neutral. Earwig flagged a few long quotes. Hook is interesting and cited in article. Nominator only has one prior credit so no QPQ needed. Nice work! Pamzeis (talk) I am not watching this page so if you want my attention, please ping me. 06:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC)