Template:Did you know nominations/The Chatwal New York
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 16:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
The Chatwal New York
- ... that Ethel Barrymore and Luisa Tetrazzini reportedly visited the Lambs Club Building even though women were not allowed to access the clubhouse's upper floors? Source: McCarthy, Joe (November 1958). "A Visit to the Lambs Club". Cosmopolitan. Vol. 145, no. 5. McCarthy 1958, p. 62.
- ALT1: ... that at the Lambs Club Building, women were not allowed to access the clubhouse's upper floors? Source: McCarthy, p. 62.
- ALT2: ... that women were not invited to the Lambs Club Building's auditorium until 1932, nor to its dining room until 1956? Source: Allen, Kelcey (May 23, 1932). "Amusements: Lambs Capitulate To The Screen". Women's Wear Daily. Vol. 44, no. 100. pp. 20–21; McCarthy, p. 62.
- ALT3: ... that the Church of the Nazarene provided a $60,000 grant to fund the purchase of the Lambs Club Building six hours before the purchase deadline? Source: Mifflin, Lawrie (July 22, 1975). "Church Gets Lambs $". New York Daily News. p. 145.
- ALT4: ... that to raise money for its clubhouse's mortgage, the Lambs began accepting women as members in 1974? Source: Vaughan, Causewell (August 22, 1974). "The Poor Little Lambs Club Is Saved From Foreclosure". New York Daily News. p. 4.
- ALT5: ... that to raise money for its clubhouse, the Lambs went gamboling? Source: Gray, Christopher (December 26, 1999). "Streetscapes/The Lambs Club; It Was Built for Theater Folks, Gambolers All". The New York Times.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/John Rauch (architect)
- Comment: I may think of more hooks later
Created by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 14:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Chatwal New York, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Article is in good condition, all statement cited. I can't view the citation so I'll AGF. ALT4 is the most hook-y for me. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 18:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)