Template:Did you know nominations/The Cyborg and the Sorcerers
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 06:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Cyborg and the Sorcerers
- ... that Lawrence Watt-Evans' The Cyborg and the Sorcerers was his first work in the hard science fiction genre, but mixed in elements of fantasy? Source: https://schlock-value.com/2018/05/13/the-cyborg-and-the-sorcerers/
- Reviewed: [[1]]
- Comment: back from a hiatus, hope this one works...
Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 14:05, 1 September 2021 (UTC).
I am sorry, but this article is not ready for DYK and possibly not even for Wikipedia. If we discard plot summary, which is 90% of the article, the remaining prose falls under 250. But even if we count the prose, this just looks bad - a single sentence of reception, sourced to what seems like a blog, so the article fails WP:N. I tagged it with {{notability}}, and if it does not improve soon I'll take it to AfD (I already did a quick WP:BEFORE and I have major concerns that this work can be saved, as I am not seeing any reliable reception of it). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:37, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: Delete the article. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:17, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Maury Markowitz, I don't want to disparage your work. We can move it to your userspace per WP:DRAFTIFY, and if/when you find more sources you can submit it for review, either to me directly, or to the WP:AFC process. How does that sound? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: Delete the article. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:17, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: Maury Markowitz (talk) 16:10, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Maury Markowitz: ? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: Should be good to go now. Maury Markowitz (talk) 10:37, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Maury Markowitz: ? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
@Piotrus: do you plan on returning to this nom? Your objections have been addressed. Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Maury Markowitz
Although Schlock Value is a blog, the two other reviews I presume are from the newspapers, which meets my interpretation of minimum required for GNG. Thank you and we are GTG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Maury Markowitz
