Template:Did you know nominations/The Nativity (Burne-Jones)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

The Nativity (Burne-Jones)

edit

The Nativity

Created by PKM (talk). Nominated by SL93 (talk) at 03:50, 12 July 2013 (UTC).

  • Article is new enough and long enough. Hook is short enough and interesting enough. I was not able to access p. 273 of the Wildman book, but assume good faith. Article appears to be compliant with core policies based on spot-checking. And copyvio detector says "no violations detected." No QPQ required as this is not a self-nom. Image has appropriate public domain tag (license for photo; 1888 painting is PD). Cbl62 (talk) 04:04, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thank you both very much, but I may have been unclear. The hook suggests that Howard commissioned the painting, which isn't correct. Perhaps a hook referencing Andrew Lloyd Weber donating the painting to the museum instead? -PKM (talk) 05:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that Edward Burne-Jones' 1888 painting The Nativity (pictured) was donated to the Carnegie Museum of Art by Andrew Lloyd Weber? SL93 (talk) 06:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Alternatively, ALT2: ... that The Nativity (pictured) was once owned by Andrew Lloyd Weber? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:35, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Another review is needed. SL93 (talk) 06:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying, Andy. Both alts check out. I like the first alt best. Cbl62 (talk) 14:03, 12 July 2013 (UTC)