- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 22:50, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
The Red and the Green
edit
5x expanded by HazelAB (talk). Self-nominated at 14:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Overall:
![](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/41/Symbol_confirmed.svg/16px-Symbol_confirmed.svg.png)
Core criteria checked per above template. Earwig copyvio score of 14.5% turns out to be unavoidable duplication of source material titles and quotes that are properly sourced in article. All in all, the article is an interesting read. GTG.
Georgejdorner (
talk) 23:27, 19 February 2016 (UTC)