- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 07:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The San Remo
The San Remo
- ... that the San Remo was once described as "an ATM for Democratic presidential campaigns" in the United States? Source: Harris, Elizabeth A.; McGinty, Jo Craven (September 17, 2012). "At Democratic Residence, Wallets Open for G.O.P."
- ALT1: ... that one New York City building was described as "an ATM for Democratic presidential campaigns" in the United States? Source: Harris, Elizabeth A.; McGinty, Jo Craven (September 17, 2012). "At Democratic Residence, Wallets Open for G.O.P."
- ALT2: ... that despite the San Remo's "lenient" standards for residency, Madonna was once barred from living there? Source: Gaines, Steven S. (2005). The Sky's the Limit: Passion and Property in Manhattan. Boston: Little, Brown; "Madonna rejected as neighbor". Newsday. July 19, 1985. p. 9.
- ALT3: ... that although Madonna applied to live in the San Remo in 1985, her application was not approved until 23 years later? Source: Ohrstrom, Lysandra. "Madonna Closes on Hard-Won $7 Million Central Park West Co-op". The Observer.
- ALT4: ... that the San Remo became a housing cooperative two years after the previous owner lost $1.25 million trying to convert it into a housing cooperative? Source: Horsley, Carter B. (November 12, 1972). "2 West Side Buildings Change Hands". The New York Times. p. R8.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hong Taechawanit
- Comment: I can provide more hooks later.
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 13:40, 4 September 2022 (UTC).
Approved pending completion of QPQ. Article is well-written, well-sourced, and new enough (submitted within 3 days of achieving GA status), of sizeable length, written neutrally, with no apparent copyvio issues (per Earwig plus spot check of the many images). Hooks are all interesting; information associated with each of the hooks appear within the article, and references check out. One comment about the rejection of Madonna's application to live at the San Remo: some of the coverage cited states that the main objection from residents was the unwanted attention and disruption from paparazzi and fans, etc. – whereas the current copy implies that it mainly came down to her recent appearances in Playboy and Penthouse. Might be worth taking a look at that? Cielquiparle (talk) 15:44, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Cielquiparle: Thanks for the review. I have done a QPQ now. As you suggested, I've also reworded the bit about Madonna's application being rejected. Epicgenius (talk) 15:11, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Approved! (@Epicgenius: Not a show stopper, but something about that passage still doesn't feel quite right. Check out the way The LA Times framed the same points re: co-op board rejection.) Cielquiparle (talk) 02:15, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
