- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 03:01, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
The Sugar Girls
edit- ... that the female factory workers featured in the book The Sugar Girls would stuff their turbans with underwear to make them look more fashionable?
5x expanded by Bellaballoo (talk). Self nom at 19:31, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
This looks fine to me, but I am a connected contributor - what does anyone else think? Dwab3 (talk) 14:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
This is a good article on an interesting non-fiction book. The main problem is that some of the text is too close to the sources. Using the "Duplicate detector", see here and here. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:14, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing these out Cwmhiraeth! I have gone through and altered all the instances of similar phrasing that can be changed. Some, however, can't really be altered - e.g. the names of the authors - and many others are direct attributed quotations, in quotation marks. I think it should all be fine now, but perhaps someone would like to check? Best wishes, Dwab3 (talk) 11:30, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Good to go now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:17, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Would rule C6 be an issue? --PFHLai (talk) 01:33, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
