- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 14:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Wilbraham
The Wilbraham
- ... that when the Wilbraham was completed, it was called "certainly the 'crack' apartment house of its kind in New York City"? Source: "A Bachelors' Home on Fifth Avenue". The Real Estate Record: Real estate record and builders' guide. Vol. 46, no. 1173. September 6, 1890. p. 305.
- ALT1: ... that the Wilbraham was built as one of "Manhattan's most romantic and most improbable apartment houses"? Source: Bender, Marylin (May 18, 1968). "Living Amid Office Buildings With a Legend of Lillian Russell". The New York Times.
- ALT2: ... that although the Wilbraham was built as a bachelor apartment, more women than men lived there by 1929? Source: The Wilbraham (PDF) (Report). New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission. June 8, 2004. p. 6.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Panot
- Comment: Additional hook suggestions would be appreciated.
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 15:46, 20 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Wilbraham; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- can't find in alt0 - Interesting:
QPQ: 
- Not done
Overall: 
@Epicgenius: Good article. QPQ needed. Though Earwig reports some copyvio. Though, they're from the LPC which I assume is public domain, though would like some confirmation. Also, i can't seem to find the hook for alt0 in the source though I may be dumb. Onegreatjoke (talk) 23:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: Thanks for the review. I haven't done a QPQ yet, but I do want to note that I accidentally put the wrong source in the hook. This is the correct source. Also, the Earwig matches are because I took a relatively long quote from the LPC report, as well as used several common phrases/proper names (e.g. "the Church of the Transfiguration", "at the northwest corner of", "in the late 19th century") which are false positives. Epicgenius (talk) 23:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: I have now done a QPQ. Sorry for the long wait. Epicgenius (talk) 18:07, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:41, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: I have now done a QPQ. Sorry for the long wait. Epicgenius (talk) 18:07, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
