Template:Did you know nominations/They Live on The Land
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
They Live on The Land
... that They Live on The Land was formulated based on interviews with 196 of the 209 families in Gorgas, Alabama?Source: Tippett, James S. (1941). "Review of They Live on the Land". The High School Journal. 24 (3): 141โ142. ISSN 0018-1498.
Created by FOARP (talk). Nominated by Amkgp (talk) at 15:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC).
This looks good as far as article length, newness, policy, QPQ etc. However, the article and the hook both use "household" (singular), when I believe "households" would be correct here. Even then though, the source uses the word "families." I would recommend that this be used in both the article and hook. It may also be a good idea to have have the citation in the article point to pg. 142 specifically, but I don't think that's super necessary here as it's only two pages at present and it's not a particularly contentious claim. AviationFreak๐ฌ 18:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- "Household" was a typo on my part, now fixed in the article and the hook per AviationFreak's kind suggestion, which I trust Amkgp is OK with (thanks for the nom btw!). I need to look at the ref to see what part of the review I was relying on for which part of the article and separate them between the first and last page of the review to see about making the ref page-specific. FOARP (talk) 19:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- @AviationFreak: Suggestions implemented. โ Amkgp ๐ฌ 19:11, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Looks good, thanks! AviationFreak๐ฌ 19:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Unpiping link; otherwise this is too ambiguous. Yoninah (talk) 17:31, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but the hook is simply too vague. It doesn't tell you what the subject is, the date, or why we should care. What do you think about adding a few more details, like:
- ALT1:
... that the social study They Live on The Land was based on interviews with 196 of the 209 families in a rural Alabama town during the Great Depression?Yoninah (talk) 18:57, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Unpiping link; otherwise this is too ambiguous. Yoninah (talk) 17:31, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- @AviationFreak: Suggestions implemented. โ Amkgp ๐ฌ 19:11, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- "Household" was a typo on my part, now fixed in the article and the hook per AviationFreak's kind suggestion, which I trust Amkgp is OK with (thanks for the nom btw!). I need to look at the ref to see what part of the review I was relying on for which part of the article and separate them between the first and last page of the review to see about making the ref page-specific. FOARP (talk) 19:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ee/Symbol_voting_keep.svg/16px-Symbol_voting_keep.svg.png)
- @Kingsif: Definitely, I hate hooks that read like math equations. Here's an alt:
- ALT1a: ... that the social study They Live on The Land was based on interviews with nearly the entire population of a rural Alabama town during the Great Depression? Yoninah (talk) 22:12, 19 December 2020 (UTC)