- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:04, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- ... that after dying possibly due to being trapped in mud, the newly discovered dinosaur Tongtianlong limosus was nearly blown up by Chinese workmen? Source: [1]
Created by Prioryman (talk) and Lythronaxargestes (talk). Nominated by Prioryman (talk) at 13:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
New enough, long enough, neutral, and a sampling of the sources indicates that plagiarism/close paraphrasing should not be a concern. Hook is definitely hooky, cited, and within the parameters for length. QPQ is done, so this should be good to go! Canadian Paul 13:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Let's try that again:
- ALT1 ... that the first known specimen of the dinosaur Tongtianlong limosus, which may have died trapped in mud, was nearly blown up by Chinese workmen? Source: [2]
EEng 06:20, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Sure, I'm OK with that too. Prioryman (talk) 20:02, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
New enough, long enough, neutral, and a sampling of the sources indicates that plagiarism/close paraphrasing should not be a concern. Hook is definitely hooky, cited, and within the parameters for length. QPQ is done, so this should be good to go! Canadian Paul 13:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)