Template:Did you know nominations/Transcriptomics technologies

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Transcriptomics technologies

(

)

... that it is possible to simultaneously measure which genes are turned on in an organism using transcriptomics technologies? source
- ALT1:... that transcriptomics technologies have changed so rapidly that previous ones become almost obsolete each decade? source
- ALT2:...

Improved to Good Article status by Rohan Lowe (talk) and Evolution and evolvability (talk). Nominated by Rohan Lowe (talk) at 00:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - n
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - n

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Promoted to GA Mar 26, 2018, nominated Mar 27, 2018. Length is good. Not a prior DYK. All main-text paragraphs cited, though the figures on Microarray and sequencing flow cell and Heatmap identification of gene co-expression patterns across different samples are uncited summaries of the text or another page. Made some minor copyedits. Neutral. Per Earwig's Copyvio Detector, 61.7% violation detected, but this refers to the Lowe R et al article in PLOS Computational Biology that this Wikipedia article was published under. However, per this source, there is a direct-quote copyvio in the lead. The hook (ALT0) is cited, interesting, correct per the source, and <200 characters. No pictures used. No QPQ required, as this is nominator's first DYK nomination. On a personal note, this is a very comprehensive (albeit technical) article, and it was a pleasure to read. My compliments to the authors. ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 09:00, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the checks. I was surprised by the detected copyvio. It turns out it's reverse plagiarism. We used the phrase here in 2016 , whereas the other source first uses it in 2017. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 01:14, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Ah, it appears so! Thank you for identifying that error. Now, all that remains is to cite the "Microarray and sequencing flow cell" figure in the article.―Biochemistry🙴❤ 01:31, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Done! T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 05:36, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Verified! All problems resolved. DYK nom is good to go.―Biochemistry🙴❤ 06:56, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for processing this DYK, and I appreciate the nice words about the Transcriptomics Technologies article. Rohan Lowe (talk) 00:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)