- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by TheAwesomeHwyh 19:40, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Trekonomics
- ... that the book Trekonomics analyzes the economics of Star Trek? Source:https://gizmodo.com/we-can-learn-a-lot-from-the-economics-of-star-trek-1780009476
- ALT1:... that the book Trekonomics argues that while the warp drive seems impossible, we can plausibly achieve Star Trek post-scarcity economy? Source: https://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/07/10/a-star-trek-future-might-be-closer-than-we-think/
- Reviewed: William Verbeck
- Comment: Student project, but should be passable. I (the course instructor) will be around and will try to fix the issues if any are raised here (since the students will inevitably disappear in few days as the course finishes). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Created by Epmdejong (talk) and Seohyeon An (talk). Nominated by Piotrus (talk) at 10:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC).
@Piotrus: In general, this article is new enough, long enough and neutral, the hook is interesting and the hook facts are cited inline. However, as shown by this Earwig screen, some of the chapter paragraphs in the "Structure" section, and the "Ferengi" paragraph are too close to their sources. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:06, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Thanks, I c/e the replicator paragraph, is it better now? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:33, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: Thanks. The chapter 3 paragraph is fine now, but the chapter 5 one is not. You can see the identical text highlighted in pink if you click on the Earwig link I gave above. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:50, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Ah, somehow I missed it. I did further c/e, I hope the issue if fixed now. The link keeps pointing to the old version, I have trouble using Earwig's tool. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Should be all right now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:33, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
