- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 07:15, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Tribhuvan Sadan
- Comment: QPQ not required; second nomination
Created by Bada Kaji (talk). Self-nominated at 18:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC).
- Starting review shortly. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 17:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Article meets eligibility criteria. i.e newness and article length. Article is well sourced and is neutral in tone. Hook is interesting and is cited. Copyvio scores ~20% in major part due to a quote that has been attributed rightly. However, the nominator might want to consider removing the quote and rewriting the sentence because the original Nepal Times article does not have it as a quote and is likely a paraphrasing done by the newspaper to begin with. Hence, we should not include it as a quote. In addition, I would encourage the nominator to consider expanding the article - to be clear, the article is good to go as-is. But looking at Hanuman Dhoka for instance there is an opportunity to build this article more than just a "History" section. Handing it back to the nominator. Some work and this is ready for homepage. Good luck. Ktin (talk) 17:57, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hey Ktin, I believe that I have resolved your comments. I will expand the article soon, the mansion is set to open soon which will spawn more sources. Thanks for the review! Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 13:55, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Edits look good. Expansion should be attempted when possible. Good to go with the current version. Adding checkmark. Good luck. Ktin (talk) 18:26, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
To
T:DYK/P6
Article meets eligibility criteria. i.e newness and article length. Article is well sourced and is neutral in tone. Hook is interesting and is cited. Copyvio scores ~20% in major part due to a quote that has been attributed rightly. However, the nominator might want to consider removing the quote and rewriting the sentence because the original Nepal Times article does not have it as a quote and is likely a paraphrasing done by the newspaper to begin with. Hence, we should not include it as a quote. In addition, I would encourage the nominator to consider expanding the article - to be clear, the article is good to go as-is. But looking at Hanuman Dhoka for instance there is an opportunity to build this article more than just a "History" section. Handing it back to the nominator. Some work and this is ready for homepage. Good luck. Ktin (talk) 17:57, 24 November 2021 (UTC)